Suggestions
Jeffrey Park, CFA
Head of Alpha Strategies and PM at Bitwise Asset Management
Jeffrey Park, CFA, is a highly experienced professional with a background in finance and asset management.
He holds a BA in Economics and International Relations from Stanford University, showcasing his strong academic foundation.
Jeffrey has held key positions in renowned organizations, including Bitwise Asset Management, where he was the Portfolio Manager and Head of Alpha Strategies.
Prior to that, he was a Partner at Corbin Capital Partners, L.P., demonstrating his expertise in investment partnerships.
His experience also includes roles such as Senior Associate at Harvard Management Company and Derivatives Trader at Morgan Stanley, highlighting his diverse skill set and knowledge in the financial sector.
Highlights
The call skew on IBIT is so much richer than BTC
Thats all you need to know about the current state of institutional optimism vs crypto-native pessimism
QE is here, it's just not what you think it is-
welcome to the era of QUALITATIVE EASING in the ample reserve system:
the argument that the Fed's recently announced "reserve management driven" purchases are not QE because they are not engaging in explicit duration or credit transformation, while understandable based on historical analogies, is not totally complete nor correct imo
yes its not explicit monetary stimulus perse supplying excess liquidity in the traditional sense (asset growth > non-reserve liabilities growth), but 1) it is still mechanically correct in a strict accounting sense (Fed is buying assets) and 2) more importantly, it is changing the behavioral risk of funding-based liquidity models where more reserves still end up freeing up bank balance sheet capacity. ie it allows more collateral leverage, more repo stability, which means more willingness to hold risk assets behaviorally which is where real financial transmissions can still occur and ends in the same place - more risk assets on non-CB balance sheets.
with reserve accounting, bank's HQLA expands due to 0% haircut under LCR which creates a certain perfect balance sheet elasticity vs t-bills. this is precisely why the timing of the SLR rules change was so important over thanksgiving, before the end of QT, and now the announcement of 40bn/month purchases - all within just 2 weeks. its too easy to call it just "plumbing" vs "stimulus" as a "neutral tool" but if the plumbing is what will permit banks to add more risk when you change the quality of money itself, thats a kind of implied stimulus to come
to put simply, bills are 'near money' but reserves are 'perfect money'. so while its not your classic liquidity-duration transformation, it is still a liquidity-quality transformation. the scope and definition of QE has to change for the ample reserve regime, vs the scarce reserve regime of the past.
TLDR: i believe we're moving from 'quantitative easing' to 'qualitative easing' where not just the 'quantity' of money, but the 'quality' of money matters.
so im still going to call it QE
P.S. stablecoin is the most pressing 'quality' of money question of our times, and why crypto aint going away

